Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/0

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FAQ

0[edit]

  1. I expanded the article 0. Can someone review to see if it is good enough, or should I expand it more? --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:04, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:04, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

Added 04:04, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|04:04, February 28, 2018 (UTC)]]

Reviewed[edit]

Humour Concept Prose Images Misc Summary
Reviewer details

A little bit about the reviewer

{{{Reviewer}}}

Humour

How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?

{{{Hscore}}}

{{{Hcomment}}}

Concept

How good is an idea behind the article?

{{{Cscore}}}

{{{Ccomment}}}

Prose and Formatting

How good does it look and how well does it read?

{{{Pscore}}}

{{{Pcomment}}}

Images

How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?

{{{Iscore}}}

{{{Icomment}}}

Miscellaneous

The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.

{{{Mscore}}}

{{{Mcomment}}}

Summary

An overall summation of the article.

{{{Fcomment}}}

Admin DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:18, June 7, 2018 (UTC)
I won't rate this article 0 I promise! :D I believe you have a good start for it with what you added including the pic. It has potential, but right now seems to be a light discussion of 0 but could use more development. Starting with the facts of 0 is a good start, that's the way I start most of my articles. Now you can see where the humor can take you from there. You could go almost anywhere! Good luck!
This was a Pee Review by Admin DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:18, June 7, 2018 (UTC)


Author: Are you satisfied by this review?
Click here, if yes
Request a new one, if no!

{{{Yes}}}