UnBooks talk:No Clean Way to Die
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Why is this part of UnNews?
Did you spell "prequel" wrong on purpose? just thought I'd let you know it's not right. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon 
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
This is rather good. Very poignant. I'm glad I'm not a bar of soap. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC) When it comes to spelling, I am indeed retarted, yet thanks for calling it good. Yea, I just looked at my soap one day and thought, man what a hard life these guys have gotta have.Spatz 21:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit]
UnBooks:No Clean Way to Die[edit]
I have not even halfway finished this. I plan to add ALOT more. This is just the basic storyline. What do you think of it so far???? Spatz 18:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9.9999 | fuckin hilarious |
| Concept: | 9.9999 | cool |
| Prose and formatting: | 9.9999 | nice form |
| Images: | 9.9999 | v.g. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9.9999 | Miscellaneous comment |
| Final Score: | 49.9995 | Funny....but whats alot? |
| Reviewer: | User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 20:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | |
| Humour: | 4 | Well, I've seen worse. You did the best you could with the concept. |
| Concept: | 2 | Unfortunately, the concept sucked. How old are you? If the answer is 12 or lower, I forgive you. It looks like a piece of sixth grade anthropomorphism with some lame dirty jokes thrown in. |
| Prose and formatting: | 6 | Readable. I couldn't quite steel myself to go through it carefully, but there weren't any glaring errors, and it flowed okay. |
| Images: | 4 | Not bad, not good. |
| Miscellaneous: | 4 | Meh |
| Final Score: | 20 | Basically, not a good article. Earlier, I rhetorically asked if you were 12; I've since checked your user page and I see you're 15. If this is the case, then this work is beneath you. Try harder next time. |
| Reviewer: | --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |