From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review AFTER the rewrite[edit]
| Humour:
|
8.5
|
a solidly humorous article that provided a more than adequate amount of chuckles.
|
| Concept:
|
9.5
|
great concept, despite similar articles (see mousetrap).
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
7.5
|
no big problems, just a few redlinks. looks a little squished in the middle, maybe the template on the right could be trimmed & un-wide-ed.
|
| Images:
|
10
|
a proper amount of images that are well executed.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
8
|
excellent mix of encyclopedic tone with absurd facts.
|
| Final Score:
|
43.5
|
a very nicely done rewrite. if you're merely looking for it to be a solid article, your work is done. if you're going to go the extra mile or you're looking for a VFH, a little length couldn't hurt. maybe a section on a famous mass-escape from a zoo, or fossil evidence of gigantic flying radioactive toasters, or something.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
| Humour:
|
8
|
Pretty damn good, I chuckled, and even laughed in places.
|
| Concept:
|
9
|
Like the concept, and well followed through.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
9
|
Well written, easy to follow, formatting is good.
|
| Images:
|
10
|
Really good images, well used. I like.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
9
|
A really good re-write.
|
| Final Score:
|
45
|
As a re-write, superb. As an article, very good, if you ask me. I'm not always a great judge of what plays well on VFH, but it would get my vote.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
|