Talk:Tickets

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tickets article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

From Pee Review

This is my first submission on Uncyclopedia, so please take it easy on me! I'd appreciate some constructive comments from you all to help me do the next one a bit better and more in "house style". I haven't yet added any pictures, and I don't know how to add the page to the category lists at the bottom of the page. I'd appreciate advice on how to add my page to the lists, and also how to search through the image files already in use? If anyone finds a suitable pic, or can add the page to the appropriate category lists in the meantime, I'd be most grateful. Thank you. Peace. Codeye.

Humour:	6	The ticket facts make no sense. The article starts off quite strong, then devolves slightly towards the end.
Concept:	8	A subtle twist at first that went off on a crazy tangent.
Prose and formatting:	4	Thine terrible formatting doth seer mine eyeballs. Either make some of those categories subcategories, or expand on what you have. Rid yourself of some of those red links.
Images:	3	None of the images really do anything for the article. You don't have a picture of a single Ticket! The last picture especially has to go.
Miscellaneous:	7	It's got imagination; I'll give it that.
Final Score:	28	Your idea is very strong, but your formatting needs work. Keep the humour as high-quality as it is in the beginning and you should be alright. For the record, I'm not a fan of random humor, but I could follow this article's thought patterns, which helped me enjoy it to the point where I actually laughed. Kudos.
Reviewer:	Judgement 05:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)