Talk:Minecraft

Wow. If Minecraft had a bad side... I would normally come up with a comeback to this rubbish, but I cannot because: 1. although it makes Minecraft sound boring... A lot of it is true. Yes, a lot of time is spent mining. And building. And crafting. I guess what makes Minecraft exciting is the fighting of monsters. 2. It's Uncyclopedia. It's supposed to be 100% rubbish.

4. A lot of this is not true about Minecraft, much more than is true.

5. There is no 3 or 5

6. I like the game for it's graphics. In 16-bit awesomeness, it can be hard to make bloody games. I like clean games. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.215.91.225 (talk • contribs)

You skipped number 3 Thetruemariozplaze (talk) 19:05, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

French Wiki

Hi, can you add ---> [[fr:Minecraft]] at the end of the article. Thanks. 78.155.15.36 16:38, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Snippy 21:07, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Someone needs to fix this rubbish up.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Appleapple1234 (talk • contribs)

Going a bit more in depth.

I was thinking about going a bit more in depth in terms of the information on this page, such as adding a section for mobs, the other game modes (hardcore, etc.), and online servers, what do you all think? Written by Thetruemariozplaze (Talk to me) 00:39, April 8, 2015 (UTC)

In-depth articles are fine as long as they don't bore people (i.e. keep up the funny all the way to the end). Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:59, April 8, 2015 (UTC)