Talk:Does the Pope shit in the woods?

		This article was nominated for deletion on February 19, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Libertarian socialism is an oxymoron

This article is inherently POV and indulges in teh fallacious meme of setting up ridiculous strawmen. By definition, the woods are shit in by the Pope.

Vote for deletion.

--24.26.134.124 01:37, 8 Mar 2005 (EST)

WAT IS NPOV??@!?!?!? --Chronarion 02:47, 8 Mar 2005 (EST)

Since POV stands for Pope Over Vegas, NPOV must be Neutered Pope Over Vegas. --66.248.0.30 05:12, 10 Mar 2005 (EST)

zappa FTW --Peder 14:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Do bears shit a Catholic? Is the Pope in the woods?

This article is the height of blashphemous. I believe, therefore, that this should be immediately removed, and recreated somewhere it belongs, like a real encyclopedia.

"THHHPPPPP!"

Satan

I think Satan loves this article, someone make a note of it; I'm too lazy and don't know how anyway--75.84.148.90 05:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Quote: "You can prevent forest fires. You as in me. Wait, that's not a question. That's barely even relevant." Laaaaaaame. I vote for deletion.

Grammar

Someone please make sense of the part with "but he sit down to do this"

Title Problems

This could do with another title as this title would not be found on wikipedia so does not parody an article. Perhaps "Why? Does the Pope shit in woods." Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:57, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

Although I do agree on moving it to "Why? Does the Pope shit in woods.", I believe not every article in Uncyclopedia has to be a parody of its Wikipedia version. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:41, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

No, no. I agree. However it is unlikely to be typed in and not a title of a page in an encyclopedia. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:56, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

Isn't this worded as the standard question "Does the Pope shit in the woods?" Aleister 26-9