Talk:Condominium

Note: This article has been Pee Reviewed at this page. Feel free to add another review any time you like, but be sure to copy the box first (for the next person).

Under Scrutiny The article to which this talkpage refers is being scrutinized by the user Lenoxus for the duration indefinite. In his/her words, the reason is: I reviewed this and Pee Review and continue to be interested in anything that happens to the article. Lenoxus will be dropping in at various moments to see how things are going, and will possibly make a variety of changes ranging from the meaningless to the universally despised. Submitters may interpret this notice as motivation to either praise or fear this user. If your thoughts concerning Condominium might specifically enlighten this user, please talk to him, her, or the Dark Lord. — Lenoxus

All right, the flipping is basically perfect now. —Lenoxus 05:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Please note: "10" means "N/A," or so I've been told, so don't get too excited about that. —Lenoxus 23:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	5	Overall, this is netiher more nor less funny than what's adequate for the topic. "Condom" puns in particular are par for the course. So you definitely get kudos for using them moderately. Except for whatever inspirations burst into your particular head, the improvement of the humor is best left to the community at large, assuming that doesn't just make it a cruft of condom gags. (But then, the community will hopefully fix that too...)
Concept:	10	Yeah, not really applicable here. Starting with the truth (often stranger than fiction) is definitely safer. More Uncyclopedia articles should be about their actual topic, like Humility. Otherwise we get the whole "point in every direction" problem... anyway, yeah. Condos good.
Prose and formatting:	5	Links always help space things out visually, so include more. It's all right if they're piped, of course, if you don't want it to be a mass of red links. Still, the prose basically approaches that of a good Wikipedia article, which is naturally our goal when there isn't a more attractive, essay-like possibility (as with You Are Dead). You clearly have the hang of what prose is supposed to be.
Images:	7	Definitely the best aspect of the whole thing. My favorite is the "gentrification" one, followed by Condi. Suggestion for the "flipping" one: make it more clear what's going on when a less "jumpy" transition (Perhaps by having it flip in three dimensions, or just moving from one side to the other like a slinky.) Maybe the image. should even be sequential, so that the house flips, then bursts into flame (hence fitting the caption's description). Loops, like those used on Spontaneous combustion, aren't necessarly bad; people can be patient and watch it again.
Miscellaneous:	10	Like so many, I'm not sure what this part is for. I'll go back and change this if I find out.
Final Score:	37	In our success-obsessed culture, fond of phrases like "110%", the concept of something being "decent" is often frowned upon. I don't care. This is decent, period. Especially since it reminds us of the weirdness of condos in and of themselves. Pat on the back, yo.
Reviewer:	Lenoxus 23:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)