Namespace:Namespace

Welcome to Namespace, the Namespace Namespace for discussing Namespaces

Is it necessary to have a namespace for discussing the necessity of namespaces? Discuss here:

Yes, of course it is! You don't expect us to discuss such matters in the, heaven forbid, forum, do you?!? --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|UotM|+S 23:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Zombiebaron, that was just a joke...

This is horrible. How bout I spruce up the place a bit?

Ah, there we are. Looks better already!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

The talk page is Talk:Namespace:Namespace, meaning this isn't a real namespace. Yet. Where's an admin when you need one? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 11:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

"Zombiebaron, that was just a joke..." I don't get the joke! WHERE IS THE JOKE! and someone please set the logo to my faboulus logo. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

guys we cant discuss Namespace:Namespace here, this is where we discuss new namespaces, not namespace:namespace itself! --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk | Rate 03:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes we can, Namespace:Namespace is for discussing the Namespace Namspace, Namespace:Game is for the Game Namespace, as is for Namespace:Talk, Namespace:Main, Namespace:Game talk, Namespace:Namespace talk etc to their appropriate namepaces. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Maybe UnMeta should be moved and created as a new namespace? --Carlb 13:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

No, it's too big. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 13:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it'd better to move this to UnMeta to prevent UnMeta from dying see Forum:UnMeta. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Also, we need a Main Page

At Namespace:Main Page. Whaddya think? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 13:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I think I am conceited. --General Insineratehymn 01:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)