Forum:We have passed the 24,000 marker

Forums: Index > Village Dump > We have passed the 24,000 marker

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5720 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Obviously the admins have been slacking with articles huffing. This proves, once more, without a doubt, that Uncyclopedia is indeed the worst. ~ 09:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Wahey for slackage! Woo! -- Hindleyite Converse 18:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

But having 24,000 articles is a good thing

It's much better than having none at all. Look, Wikipedia has over 2 million articles. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 09:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I think having 24 articles would be better. I've only written about 24 articles, so we keep those, get rid of the rest, presto! Instant improvement! --UU - natter 10:01, Mar 24

Maybe if we all voted for the best 12, that would improve qaulity even more.--    11:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

So are we all in favor of deleting 23,988 articles and keep 12? ~ 12:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a good April Fool's idea. Vote for the 12 articles that Uncyclopedia will keep!--    13:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

All of my featured +another one to spare. ~ 13:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Gotta keep Get Some Mortgage! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 16:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

if we had a sort of march madness tournament, we could reduce the amount of articles down to 12 or so. i'll get to work on drawing up a bracket...SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Now there's an idea!--    19:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

For April Fools, we can blank pages! And the next day, we can beg the admins to have them restored! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 01:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Wait...

I came up with the idea of deleting all but the 7000 best articles quite a while ago. Then, we hire the Jews to write 21000 more. BAM! Instant awesomeness. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Just delete everything

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That could work. Start with Led's, Ljlego's, STM's, and Cajek's stuff. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That would be everything. ~ 09:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

As long as my stuff stays. Even the blah pages that amuse only me. Then I would rule! Rule! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Modusopedia? The Encyclopedia that any one can....operandi? ~ 09:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

MOpedia. Obviously. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The obvious: Moduncyclopedia.--    15:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

What's with the -pedia stuff? Just call it Modusoperandia. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

We're pediaphiles.--    15:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

So, you've been to my home country, Soauu? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Yup. I used DrStrange's map to get there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

This one!--    19:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)