Forum:Suggestion:No more voting to ban and restrict people in cruel and unusual ways
Is anyone else just the tiniest bit fed up of all the Trigger Happiness going on in the forums at the moment? Far be it from me to suggest that the (Uncyc) world is not going to hell in a handbasket, but could we please, just for a while, just let the admins do their job? If anybody has any brilliant ideas in the meantime, perhaps they could get some support from some admins before starting the inevitable new topic "I am the second coming of the Lord and have the answer that will make everything better! No really, you've never thought of this before - it's so much better than that love thy neighbour shit!!"
If this is not possible, I reserve the right to post:
FIX FIX FXI!
on every such page that appears. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Vote for Shutting Up
- Nom and for -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Oh, girl, human males just can't live without a little sword fencing. Of course, in a chivalrious way. -- herr doktor needsAbrain
[scream!] 16:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - Strongest possible extreme lesbian against. Check Special:Newpages, Special:Shortpages, Special:Deadendpages and even Special:Randompage. Not to mention the more discreet vandalism, like simply inserting "_____ is gay" into random articles. You could have at least 1 admin online 24/7 for each special page on this site and some vandalism would still slip through. Not to mention me - I have ADHD so writing quality articles is more or less out of the question - take away my ability to report, revert, tag or otherwise beat the shit out of some of the rubbish that we get, and I can do little beyond lurk on IRC. --officer designate
Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - Against. Some bitching is good.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tsk - and you admins call yourselves party-poopers. Why, I don't believe you could poop on a party if it were deliberately toilet-themed. /me goes and sulks in the corner. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Although, I am a pooper of parties, you must have mistaken me for someone who's an admin. I feel it's best to let Uncyclopedia be Uncyclopedia, and am for the crushing of men's souls only when Uncyclopedia gets in the way of it being itself.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dammit, why am I so blind as to reply to Hinoa over his post instead of under it? Gah! -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Although, I am a pooper of parties, you must have mistaken me for someone who's an admin. I feel it's best to let Uncyclopedia be Uncyclopedia, and am for the crushing of men's souls only when Uncyclopedia gets in the way of it being itself.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tsk - and you admins call yourselves party-poopers. Why, I don't believe you could poop on a party if it were deliberately toilet-themed. /me goes and sulks in the corner. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- But I like chewing out people who do that! T_T —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 17:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Jumping on the "Against" bandwagon. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against I support an initiative to restrict creating pages to registered users. I really think that it's not unreasonable to make people do that.--Shadowlost 17:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Have you read any of the pages where that was suggested before? ANY of them? —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 17:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- There there, Hinoa. (/me gives Hinoa a cup of hot chocolate & a blanket fresh out of the dryer) There there.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Have you read any of the pages where that was suggested before? ANY of them? —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 17:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- For, with exceptions If you are an extreme moron, this rule should not apply. --Starnestommy 23:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against No, you shut up. -- 23:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I'll just use my tyrranical dictator powers to ban anyone who causes repeated stupidity. AHAHHAHAHAHAH! Seriously, though, folks, how about we lay off on the whole trend for a while? ---
Rev. Isra (talk) 05:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Democracy has failed
Long live Sexocracy! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)