Forum:Has Uncyc "jumped the shark"?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Has Uncyc "jumped the shark"?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6700 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

"Hey, Richie, watch this!"

Subject. - User:Guest/sig 08:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• No. --General Insineratehymn 14:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fnord. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Possibly. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 15:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fnord. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Pie. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Two things. 1) UnNews certainly hasn't, as the quality of articles ther are still showing a net-gain over time. 2)The question was asked in January, and proved to be too early. Uncyclopedia, as a web community and not a TV show, has the fortunate situation of an nearly infinate supply of users coming in. I think the current state is a result of two things: 1) Google castrating us. 2) We need to treat n00bs just a little better around here, methinks.--<<>> 16:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• I deletedhuffed the shark. No need for jumping. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 18:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Edited. --~~FlareNUKE (Page Talk Contrib The Breakfast Club) 19:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Sharks are my friiiieeeeeennnnnnds! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Not at all. Though I know nothing of the technical aspect of things, I've still been reading consistently strong material here which is why I'm still around. Happy? ;) -- Imrealized 19:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• 42. TZM 20:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• In Soviet Russia, shark jumps YOU!! 193.113.200.216 00:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Well, the articles are getting better, and the users seem to be streaming in pretty fast. But I must admit, I haven't been seeing as many edits as of late.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• I'm going to say yes just to be different. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia IS the shark. And the state.--SN W | T 05:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• No, but some have wondered about Oscar - David Gerard 14:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Err... fnord? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• "Jumped the shark"? I thought we had just started!! -- Colonel Swordman 15:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• I think it might have. And it's kind of sad, really. But it might just be that it's summer, and when everybody gets back to the daily routine, in about September or something, it'll be BAAACK!!! --Nerd42Talk 16:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• I think the shark ate it alive a long time ago -- n00b 01:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, the funniest part of Uncyclopedia was when Benson joined. It just don't get any funnier than that, and it was sweeps week when that happened. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 02:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Viewer ratings have definitely slipped. Uncyclopedia has gone on way past its prime, not to mention the inane spinoffs about retarded alien room mates in some vain attempt at comedy. Uncyclopedia had it great when there was nothing else to watch, but people change the channel, it's that simple. Look at how many wikis are out there now, waiting to be vandalized. Ihavenolife 16:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia has jumped the shark. Literally. Chron tied the servers to a pair of waterskis and drove them over a shark. --EvilZak 06:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• The last time this was brought up, a poop writing competition was held to improve article submissions. It seems that may be in order to save Uncyclopedia once again...--<<>> 13:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Funny you should mention that....meet me in my office..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• insert clever way of voting here] Son of a Peach 14:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)