Uncyclopedia talk:Top10 09/May
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Where's the rest? like only half the month is here... ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:54 31 May 2009
- Months are 42 days long now? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Occasionally. No but really, some articles are missing. Or is there some new initiative I'm unaware of? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 00:58 1 June 2009
- I just use a program that Spang made. There was one missing last month, though. If anyone knows a better way that doesn't actually involve work, I'm all ears (originally, I kept track as each page got featured, but that required using my whole ass, rather than just half). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh well if you like I could keep a track of things as they are featured. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 01:10 1 June 2009
- It just there's like a week missing, two days of which were mine, which is really the only reason I noticed. shall I just sort it out? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 01:12 1 June 2009
- I think I can sort this out. Mind if I help? Staircase CUNt 01:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just use a program that Spang made. There was one missing last month, though. If anyone knows a better way that doesn't actually involve work, I'm all ears (originally, I kept track as each page got featured, but that required using my whole ass, rather than just half). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Occasionally. No but really, some articles are missing. Or is there some new initiative I'm unaware of? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 00:58 1 June 2009
- I raised the Spangsignal. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. Spang did the thing with the stuff. His fix makes that page that he wrote that one time show everything (Oscar, which was a feature for June but was set up for feature in May should really be on the Top next month, but since people have already voted for it I'll leave it. Next month, I'll forget about this and so, if you choose to, you'll be able to vote for it twice. I'm all magnanimous 'n' shit). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Why?...[edit]
Is this called the top ten, when only the top three get special mentions and isn't it only the top three that go through to the top ten of the year? Why isn't this called the top three? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 02:23 2 June 2009
- The people here are too oblivious. Staircase CUNt 02:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Because it's part of the whole "Top 10 09" scheme. Like subpage shit and all. 02:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Oops.[edit]
Oops, I wasn't logged in. It was me anyway. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 13:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- We've had quite enough of your balderdash, Mister Kieler. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)