I found this old VFD survivor from 2010, that the initial author Rio GT has long since disowned and didn't finish. I rewrote a slight majority of it trying to get it to be more relavent and less repetitious. I look forwards to your suggestions, even if it's just to send this screaming metal death trap back to the VFD junkyard. Irritable of contents (talk) 19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Added 19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
|
[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)]]
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--WeatherUnderground (talk) 20:27, February 2, 2017 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very funny article with some rather original ideas. I like the idea of deconstructing the illogical nature of an action film. I must admit though, that I didn't read the whole thing. If this could be trimmed down to like 50 or 30 ways to kill poor Sarah, it would be much better - some the ideas are so far fetched that they make no sense, and I think the reader gets the message halfway through the list. After that, it's just repeating jokes. Regardless of this, I think it is a laugh to read the totally obvious things, that the filmmakers never thought of. Good work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{{Yes}}}
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--Atomicdragon136 (talk) 02:19, February 16, 2018 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure about this. Seeing that this has been a survivor for 8 years, it seems like this may be something to archive, but not delete. Maybe if there is a such thing, put it in an archive section?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{{Yes}}}