Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Thurso (re sub)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FAQ

Thurso[edit]

I have reworked this article since the first pee and thought I'd resubmit it for a second opinion. Incidentally some local people have read this and were quite positive about it, if - by chance - you are a local person, by all means leave comments on the article talk page - hell edit it if you think you're good enough - but don't do a full review as I'd prefer to have some non-local opinion as , believe it or not, there are more non-locals that need to find this funny too. orian57 02:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
If you're gonna do a resub, you have to remove the filled out table, so it goes back in the queue. C+P it into your article's talkpage, that's what I'd do, mhmm. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:16, Mar 19
ah, thank you, was kinda wondering about that. --orian57 03:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
"Chances are, if you’re reading this, you’re from Thurso, Googled it in one of your frequent free moments, and then waded through 36+ pages of mistruthful cow-poo to arrive here: the cold, unequivocal truth. If not then most likely this was an accident." That made me laugh. :) I'd review this but I'm afraid the culture would be too lost upon me. Mightydandylion 08:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Please review me! --orian57 02:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This table is set for a, welcome, critic and it's free!:

Humour: 5 Very in joke-y and some but few people outside of Thurso may understand it.
Concept: 5 It's been done before but not on a place in the Scottish Highlands.
Prose and formatting: 3 Poorly laid out with far too many subsections. Good language and grammar though which saves it.
Images: 9 Good use of images throughout and all relevant and mildly/moderately humourous.
Miscellaneous: 5.5 Averaged due to Pee Review guidelines.
Final Score: 27.5 Just needs cleaning up due to the many subsections and a bit easier to get into for "Foreigners" would help.
Reviewer: --TheGreenOne 19:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for the interest. Or something. --orian57 02:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)