Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rogue Wan: A Star Wars Tragedy

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FAQ

Rogue Wan: A Star Wars Tragedy[edit]

TillDillBill (talk) 00:57, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Added 00:57, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|00:57, February 3, 2017 (UTC)]]

Reviewed[edit]

Humour Concept Prose Images Misc Summary
Reviewer details

A little bit about the reviewer

{{{Reviewer}}}

Humour

How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?

{{{Hscore}}}

{{{Hcomment}}}

Concept

How good is an idea behind the article?

{{{Cscore}}}

{{{Ccomment}}}

Prose and Formatting

How good does it look and how well does it read?

{{{Pscore}}}

{{{Pcomment}}}

Images

How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?

{{{Iscore}}}

{{{Icomment}}}

Miscellaneous

The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.

{{{Mscore}}}

{{{Mcomment}}}

Summary

An overall summation of the article.

{{{Fcomment}}}

--WeatherUnderground (talk) 20:48, February 3, 2017 (UTC)
I read the introduction and the two first parts of the plot synopsis before I realized, this is going nowhere. The article is VERY long, which is okay if you have something clever and funny to say, and there are many parts of Rogue One and Star Wars in general you can lampoon. But rambling about random persons doing random things, only sometimes related to Star Wars isn't really going anywhere. There's definitely potential in your writings, the Cast section is very original. It's just too long, too rambling, and too far away from Rogue One - remember, people who look this up sort of expect jokes about the film, not just random nonsense. Good luck writing your next article as you certainly have a knack for writing, but this isn't very good I must say. May the force be with you!
This was a Pee Review by --WeatherUnderground (talk) 20:48, February 3, 2017 (UTC)


Author: Are you satisfied by this review?
Click here, if yes
Request a new one, if no!

{{{Yes}}} Yes