This article really sucked before, so I rewrote it. Now it only marginally sucks. I could use an opinion, so I can ignore it. Thanks! --THE 20:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Humour:
|
8
|
I chuckled silently to myself a few times. It's a very subtle, satirical humor, which is nice. I don't expect anyone to actually laugh at this one.
|
Concept:
|
8
|
"I only buy this magazine for the articles." I'm not sure if you were aiming for that joke, but it seems like it. Well done. I think it needs more jokes about how the philosophical issues involved are not appropriate for children under 18.
|
Prose and formatting:
|
9
|
Elegant, in a way similar to the prose in the magazine.
|
Images:
|
6
|
Needs more in this area.
|
Miscellaneous:
|
7.8
|
The images/text ratio is a little heavy on the text size. There should at least be an image at the top to open up the article.
|
Final Score:
|
38.8
|
Good concept, subtle humor, needs some work on the images.
|
Reviewer:
|
Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 18:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
|