A bunch of people promised to get this featured a while back, but somehow it never got nominated. So I've decided to debase myself and go after the self-nom. It's kinda apt actually. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 16:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
| Humour:
|
8.5
|
The whole article is one huge collection of double entendres? Awesome.
|
| Concept:
|
7.5
|
I've seen stuff like this before, but it's a good idea.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
10
|
Very well done, I didn't see any problems and it really does feel like I'm reading a (slightly messed up) broshur (Brainfart! I just forgot how to spell that word! 0_0)
|
| Images:
|
8.5
|
The images really add to the feel of the 'broshure'-ness of the page.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
8.6
|
It's kinda long, I was almost tempted to not read it. It's still very clever though. I'm not sure how you could fix this length problem without ruining the joke though...
|
| Final Score:
|
43.1
|
Job well done.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--Ninja Kow 18:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
|