Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo: Pass English

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

HowTo: Pass English

Humour:	7	Was an OK article, it could be better too. Didn't really make me laugh, but it wasn't so boring either. The ways to pass English were pretty clever.
Concept:	7	The concept was good and worked well. Full points for that.
Prose and formatting:	7	The link to bat-fucking insane didn't work. You could fix that. There seemed to also be few minor mistakes, such as a "^" in front of some links. And you missed a capitol letter in one point. "^teachers have no hobbies. or souls." There.
Images:	7	Any images would have been nice. There were none now. Images are always good.
Miscellaneous:	7	The lists Advantages and Disadvantages were very good.
Final Score:	35	I would give it 7 out of 10.
Reviewer:	Finntastic 10:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Note: reviewer didn't put in scores, so I just took the 7 out of 10 and put 7 in each category (it has to have scores before the software takes it off pee review to the "reviewed" page). Personally, I liked your idea, and some of the ways to pass English were funny. However, some of the more crass humour such as "beating up nerds," "bat fuck insane," and "retards" tends to be cliche and detracts from the article. Sir Roger 06:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)