Hello! This was my first article, I published it a few days ago. I'd love to have it reviewed and feel free to make it funnier.
Andretexugo (talk) 22:31, July 7, 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Added 22:31, July 7, 2017 (UTC)
|
[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|22:31, July 7, 2017 (UTC)]]
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have read through your article and thought it was very good. I would've liked to have an image of the explorer himself in the article. The terrorist section at the end was a bit out of left field. I think a section about Shackleton's time as an unqualified diplomat during World War I may serve the article better. I'd recommend reading Southpole.com as it has a lot of information on the history of arctic explorers, information about Ernest can be found underneath "Antarctic History/The Explorers/Ernest Shackleton". Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{{Yes}}}
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, that's south-pole.com, if you don't put in the dash it won't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{{Yes}}}
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
How good is an idea behind the article?
How good does it look and how well does it read?
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
An overall summation of the article.
This was a Pee Review by TheEAjawa (talk) 23:17, August 28, 2017 (UTC)