Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cricket

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Cricket

An article made by tons of IPs and accidental users (including me). I cleaned it up a bit and I put it here. I need a masochists who could review it and:

• Article needs to be long, I don't want to hear "needs to be shorter". Article is as long as cricket game is.
• Article is long and can't be divided into several smaller articles. Otherwise it will lose its charm.

Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:08, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Humour:	6	Some great ideas here, perhaps a re-read might help develop some of the prose humour a bit more. Excellent use of the cricketing terms & their definitions though.
Concept:	10	Very thoroughly thought through and good execution.
Prose and formatting:	6	Some of the prose, particularly the introduction, contains a few mis-spellings & missed words. Also, possibly some over-use of the ellipsis (...). Easy enough to correct though.
Images:	8	Plently of images & very good captions.
Miscellaneous:	7.5	Good overall effort.
Final Score:	37.5	Nice article. Only real areas to look at are spelling & grammar, and develop the introduction humour a little more. Overall a very enjoyable read!
Reviewer:	Good Old Ted - LOB - What ho!