Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Babble

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Babble

I wrote an article. It happens to be the article linked to in the header. It even has the same title as implied by the Pee Review entry. But enough bantering; use numbers and colors in the table below to tell me what you think of it. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 20:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	9	I laughed pretty hard. It wasn't Uncyclopedia is the worst hard, but hard.
Concept:	10	Usually this is where I give bad articles extra points to keep them from self-terminating, but in this case a ten is deserved.
Prose and formatting:	9	Good Prose
Images:	10	n/a. Honestly I can't think of a way images would add to this article. I mean sure, you could add something gibberish, but it would be kind of stupid.
Miscellaneous:	8	w/e
Final Score:	46	This article is really good, especially for one without images. Who knew. Try to think of some pictures though, if only to satisfy the proles.
Reviewer:	LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 21:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! I'll come up with something in the images department, I'm sure. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 00:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)