Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Another "You" take
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Another "You" take[edit]
And thus you rate 10 on all categories of note. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
| Humour: | 5 | A good concept stretched out for too long. Try to start smaller and end bigger, and perhaps have some theme about what "you" are doing - some series of actions which "you" do that gets progressively more ridiculous or violent, for example. Have it relate to your concept. |
| Concept: | 8 | Yes, I totally agree that the vast majority of articles that get featured are not written in the encyclopedic style, and that this is a problem. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Yep, you got the number of those "you" articles there. |
| Images: | 5 | Not exactly spectacular image quality, but that's not really what your article is about anyway. |
| Miscellaneous: | 5 | Like I said, I think you need to sustain the humour by adding another funny element to the article. As it is, it's just one joke spread over a page. I'll leave it to you to decide what. |
| Final Score: | 31 | Good luck with any rewrites! If this review seems sparse to you and you have more questions, don't hesitate to contact me. |
| Reviewer: | YouFang 19:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |