Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/A Very Special Article
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Very Special Article[edit]
—GINA Is Not an Acronym (talk) 04:25, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
I saw this was a requested article, the muse struck, and this is what I came up with. Let me know what you think!
- The first paragraph of the current revision has been irking me more or less from the start. First, I am not sure the opening pun is very good. Second, Focus on the Family seems to cater to adults interested in sensationalizing narratives, so there is some discord between the first two sentences. If anyone has only enough time to critique or suggest alternatives to two sentences, it would be stellar if you could make them the first two.—GINA Is Not an Acronym (talk) 01:57, August 7, 2018 (UTC)
Added 04:17, August 4, 2018 (UTC) |
Reviewed[edit]
Introduction to your reviewer I usually start a review by saying how unqualified I am to review it. This makes me sound humble and gains me false respect. But in this case, I'll make an exception. I've written over 50 of these PR things here and have yet to be shot for doing it. So please don't shoot me. Note I'm putting some suggested changes in (). For example, "dogs(comma) cats...." would mean I'd suggest adding a comma between dogs and cats. | ||
Concept: | 8 | Uncyclopedia editors are losers and don't have a real life. Like we didn't already know that. Just kidding--I think. Yes, I know it's only talking about four--five--editors, and I like the concept. I gave it an 8 instead of higher simply because Internet junkies not having a life is rather a stereotype, and Uncyclopedia editors is something of an inside joke. But that's OK; a lot of funny articles are about stereotypes and I think you do the inside jokes so an outsider will fully get it. |
Prose and Formatting: | 9 | I'll put my comments on Humour here with the rest, but will score them separately.
Title
Intro
The Editors
Timmy
Alice
Phylicia
TJ
T.J.'s Funeral
Epilogue
Categories
|
Humo(u)r: | 8 | Humour comments under Prose section. |
Images: | 8 | Obviously, there's no images, so I can't give a real rating here. I have mixed feelings on them--putting images of real people with imaginary problems can involve real-life legal issues. |
Miscellaneous: | 6.75 | Average of the above minus 1.5. I artificially lowered this score for reasons explained below. |
Final Score: | 39.75 | I like this article very much; most of my comments are nitpicky. The only significant weak spot to me is your introduction. I consider 40 to mean I want to nominate it for feature, so I artificially lowered your score to encourage you to make improvements. Please let me know when and if you edit this. |
Reviewer: | King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:46, August 11, 2018 (UTC) |