UnBooks talk:My sojourn/Chapter 1

		This article was nominated for deletion on June 20, 2006. The result of the discussion was 'Keep'.

		This article was nominated for deletion on January 25, 2007. The result of the discussion was 'Keep'.

Tell me that it doesn't deserve the batfuck template, Pants. And please do so in haiku, because it's 4 in the morning and I'm kinda loopy. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The template detracts
from the overall humor
of the funny... ness.

I agree, though. it IS batfuck insane. I like it too much

Batfuck though it is,
I giggled my whole ass off
Thus, I VFH.

--PantsMacKenzie 09:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, señor Pants.

Now I will go vote for it.

Well, officially.

—Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so I retract my original distain of this article in favor of...well...favoritism. The moment I first saw it I thought "Not another crappy 1K-no-content waste of space. However, After reading it through, not even my resolve to hate (which is usually quite strong) could hold me from hysterics. There is a magic and beauty to this article which was truly unexpected. I quite enjoyed it. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great00:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Audio version over here --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

From VFH

• For! Oh. My. God. I lolled so hard. I'm serious. It's a fantastic article. The headings are beautiful. --PantsMacKenzie 09:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• No. Funny.. admittedly.. but not VFH-wise.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 09:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• For!!!--Spin 09:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for: Put the batfuck template back on. It completes it. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Condition met to my satisfatcion. For. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• The zen of this article is unsurpassed. --KATIE!! 09:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• NRV --Splaka 09:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against- Would it really look that good on the front page? --Materialist F@H UFoW MUN ONS 09:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Oh my God. The mental images this article conjures up is so much worse than Goa Tse. No way on the front page. A++ for humor, though.--<<>> 09:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. My sex is free now!!! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|NotM|+S 09:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• For, per Brad. Uncyclopedia articles need to make the reader CRY REAL TEARS of SHAME and HORROR. Besides, I want to soften up the readers for when I finally finish writing "Cancer Porn" - David Gerard 09:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• AGAINST! ALLAH! dissapproves, and needed to offset DG's vote... ALLAH! 09:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against this crap needs to be deleted. --86.134.61.78 09:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

And see, this is why I usually don't edit Uncyc at 4:40 in the morning. (NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN AGAINST VOTE.) —Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional For Conditional on mye being drunk. (I am.) ---Rev. Isra (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• <s>Against because I'm a big dumb jerk, and also this is too short.</s> UNSIGNED! NULL AND VOID! —Hinoa KUN (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC) I forgot to sign. I suck. —Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• EXTREME LESBIAN AGAINST and may I also suggest NRV'ing the article, the author, and the nominator. - User:Guest/sig 10:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• No. Really. Just no. It's doesn't suck badly. It's just not front page material. --User:Guffawing Crow/sig 11:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against Like everyone else here, i think its good, but not really front page style -- User:No13 12:58, 26 March (UTC)