Talk:Yad

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies

I actually used one of these in my...Bar Mitzva...~Jewriken.GIF 14:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Jewish stuff is so cool:) - are you like a practicing Jew or is it like over here where you only do it for family occations?--Sycamore (Talk) 14:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
One of those...pokey things? JudgeZarbi Icons-flag-gb.png TALK 14:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Let's just say I follow the more fun tradition - and Bar Mitzva is certainly one of them, loads of presents :) ~Jewriken.GIF 14:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Also a good opportunity to get drunk when you're too young, of course. RabbiTechno 16:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Pee Review[edit]

Humour: 9 It's definitely at the right level of bizarre. Cheers for not going too far with any imagery. I have to say the martial arts section was my favourite bit. The idea of someone defending themselves with an alleged sex toy caught me off guard in a great way.
Concept: 9 Definitely not where I would have gone with it, but then again I wouldn't have gone anywhere with it...but really it's a nice one. Good take on the topic without being particularly offensive.
Prose and formatting: 9 Very encyclopedic, which is excellent because that's what keeps the whole concept funny and not just pointlessly vulgar. I think that all of the pictures being on the right side looks a bit boring, but that's just my personal preference. Very well written.
Images: 8 Like I said, all of them being on the right side made it look a bit boring but it wasn't too big of a deal. I think maybe a photoshopped picture of a Chinese martial artist practicing the way of the yad would be pretty good. Though some might argue that leaving it to the imagination makes it better--either way that won't make or break the article.
Miscellaneous: 8.8 The notes section was a nice touch.
Final Score: 43.8 Really solid article. Not much to say in terms of what could be improved other than what I said above. Maybe it could be longer, but I personally thought the length was dead-on in that you kept from beating the idea to death.
Reviewer: While this review may have not turned out to be particularly helpful, this user apologises and kindly asks you to refer to his pee policy-->NO REFUNDS! PaddyAtkinson 03:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)