Talk:Uncyclo-tan
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This article was nominated for deletion on May 9, 2016.
The result of the discussion was Moved.
|
|||
2010[edit]
Yo[edit]
Yo homies, wikipedia:Uncyclo-tan is up for deletion —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.66.197.17 (talk • contribs) 07:54 January 5, 2010
- Um, I don't see why Uncyclo-tan should have its own article. The subject fails WP:V in that we at Uncyclopedia don't even know what she is. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 08:04, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
- The info is hoax...somebody copy word from here and paste there. Ace Attacker 16:07, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
- She's a moe anthropomorphism, a humanoid representation of a non-human object, similar to Wikipe-tan. It's fine that she has her own article.--68.48.135.146 20:07, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
- The info is hoax...somebody copy word from here and paste there. Ace Attacker 16:07, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't even know that Uncyc was required to obey TOW's Verifiability standards. Tyciol 17:35, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
But[edit]
Don't we already have Sophia? ...Not that I'm against having a Uncyclo-tan. 05:37, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
Tan[edit]
- "-tan" indicates that she is below the age at which she can experience the feeling of love."
That's the first I've heard of it. From what I'm used to, -tan is very similar to -chan, only more cutesy, something like that. Furthermore, ED has Ae-tan and she looks like she can experience love. Tyciol 17:35, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
- This is a humor wiki, we aren't consistent across articles. --Mn-z 20:45, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
An <gallery>in the Image Gallery section? 200.96.90.168 03:58, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
And...[edit]
...a male version of uncyclo-tan? --93.41.3.63 19:47, September 24, 2013 (UTC)