Talk:USERNAME template abuse
| This article was nominated for deletion on June 22, 2014.
The result of the discussion was Keep.
|
|||
| This article was nominated for deletion on November 17, 2013.
The result of the discussion was Keep.
|
|||
| This article was nominated for deletion on June 10, 2007.
The result of the discussion was Keep.
|
|||
I don't like these kind of articles. I really don't know why but I sometimes get offended, not at the insults, but the place the template is used. I'd like to see an article that uses the template to compliment. --Ryan57 / 
11:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
You're a n00b, aren't you? These articles are supposed to be humorous, if you are offended then don't read them. Read something else.
This article is funny, even more so when you read when you're not logged in! 
Haldo 
(talk at me) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC) (BTW, I've never used that template and never will.)
What??? What was the last time I 've ever used a USERNAME template? On the only article I 've ever written completely by myself, I have never, ever, used the USERNAME template, and it's history record is there to prove me right. Show me one history record I 've ever used a USERNAME template onto, and I will immediately consider all of your false claims legitimate. I know you can't because I never do that.
PS: How can someone enter a USERNAME template in uncyclopedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kurkosdr (talk • contribs)
- Remember to sign your posts. 05:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
BTW I think that <insert name here> is the best uncyclopedian!
- Well, that is partially true. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)