Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Talk:Tiddlywinks
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This article was nominated for deletion on Febuary 28, 2007.
The result of the discussion was 'Keep'.
|
|||
[[Category:Deletion survivor/Error: Invalid time.]]
From Pee Review[edit]
| Humour: | 4 | I like the jab at Finland. I don't know why. I like Finland. |
| Concept: | 6 | The concept is alright. Badly implemented. |
| Prose and formatting: | 7 | Well formatted, and the mock-encyclopedic tone is good. |
| Images: | 4 | I'm not sure that I entirely like the concept of the picture that's included. Kinda non sequitur, and not in a good way. |
| Miscellaneous: | 2 | This is where the suggestions come in. I'd suggest giving an excerpt from the Tiddlywinks Rule Book after the introductory paragraph. Have fun with it. It would be a definite improvement. Also, I'd suggest reading the Extreme Tiddley-Winks article for their interpretation of the game (after all, they came first). That adds continuity and makes it overall funnier when you read it from the See Also section. Which I would suggest adding to. |
| Final Score: | 23 | And now for my final thought. I think this article has some untapped potential (it's not an LOL concept, but there's only a handful that are) and that you need to tap it. Right on the shoulder. Until then, sayonara, I hope I helped. |
| Reviewer: | Ljlego 18:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | |