Talk:The Critique of Pure Reason
Hello, Enigma, I think this is a very funny article on a cerebral plain. For most uncyclopedians it is way too much for their small and still shrinking brains. Oh, did I mention being drunk ? I am! hihihi! Anyroads, I took the liberty of adding a few paragraphs in the Alternatives_to_Pure_Reason section. Although I believe the presented arguments to be on par, perhaps you might want to check my (mis)use of yor beatiful british langage. Hey! What happened to 'u' ! Oh there you are, you rascal. Being a Dutch bastid myself, I am definately not a native speller nor an grammaticor of The queens britches. Buuuurp -- di Mario 18:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit]
I like the way this article's going so far. At the moment I'm mainly looking for some ideas for the latter sections. I think I've a good foundation, I just need some help ending it strong, maybe a few ideas for jokes. Any opinions would be welcome. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- An obvious alternative to Pure Reason is Random Fucking Crap. Good article, I'll let you know if I think of anything else. --Sir Zombiebaron 03:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Fine stuff. I added the 'highbrow' template - coming from me, consider this a compliment. If you don't like it, feel free to remove. As a suggestion, I think you may add historical events suposedly triggered by the book. But I just don't have any idea of how to ilustrate this article. herr doktor needsAbrain
[scream!] 19:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm. I may keep the template, may not. I generally don't like using them, as I think they needlessly clutter up the article, but this might be a case where it could work. Time will tell. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!--22:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey. I corrected the spelling of Eshatology because I am a hard ass.
HAHA YOU BASTARDS! I ACTUALLY READ THIS BOOK![edit]
It's the most insane thing I've ever read. Totally awesome. • <-> (Dec 12 / 03:42)