Talk:Powerpuff Girls

Anybody wanna share criticism, comments, and/or other bullcrap related to the article?

I put in an image of Mojo from Chrono Cross, and am planning on writing his Chrono Alcoholism (fake game) backstory in here. Anybody else object? Crazyswordsman 02:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm just glad they got rid of the nude picture they had here when I first read the article.Genital Sniper 03:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

---

The image make me lost my respect for the uncyclopedia. Child nudity shouldn't be allowed anywere, even in cartoon form.--206.48.129.131 14:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

...people are supposed to respect Uncyclopedia? But, I do agree... that's disgusting. -Emilyyyy 08:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

We actually have a funny one somewhere around here. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

umm people this page sucks ass i don't care bout the pic it just ain't funny heck it's not even any good 86.141.188.96 11:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Great Jibbering Jebus! My eyes! -- Hindleyite Converse 11:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Really that picture has got to go. It's slightly child-porn esque, and not really what we want on uncyclopedia.

Deleting now, revert if you can come up with a reason why not to. --Dork lord 14:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Sick In the Head

Whoever made this picture is nothing short of a perv. Nasty.Delete it.

Score:-9999999999999999999999999999/10

--209.244.188.154 00:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Arcanaruto

I think whoever created this PAGE is the worst kind of perv. Three genetically-engineered kindergartners fight crime, so that leads to them being whores? I'm not sure if it's more misogynist or pro-pedophilia, but it's just not funny. it's sick. --206.82.75.161 12:20, October 15, 2011 (UTC)

ANIME ADAPTION

Shouldn't the Anime Adaption of The Powerpuff Girls (Demashita! Powerpuff Girls Z) be mentioned in this article, or it's own article, or at least be mentioned at all?

Do you mean Demashita! Powerpuff Girls Z.

152.32.110.49‎

This is not Wikipedia so don't "correct" everything into a fact-based article. Your edits are subject to reversion at this time. The article is still slightly pervy, but not horribly so considering the amount of testosterone on site. -- (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

I concur that the edits are not an improvement and have undone them. Spıke 🎙️20:44 16-Mar-20