Talk:Portal:Science/Pregnancy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
subpages[edit]
- User:Mnbvcxz/PregnancyPortal/Highlight random feature article function
- User:Mnbvcxz/PregnancyPortal/Pics random featured image function
- User:Mnbvcxz/PregnancyPortal/DYK did-you-knows, general (divided to keep things from appearing twice)
- User:Mnbvcxz/PregnancyPortal/DYK2 did-you-know, abortion
- User:Mnbvcxz/PregnancyPortal/DYK3 did-you-know, mpreg, vore, and newts
--Mnb'z 05:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- User:Mnbvcxz/Preglist for portal work. --Mn-z 00:38, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
talk[edit]
Why doesn't this surprise me?
21:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)- What, don't you think we need a pregnancy portal? --Mnb'z 06:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yes! Yes we do! The thing that doesn't surprise is me is how you are the person who created it. Which is a positive thing. =)
- Its nice to see someone else thinks we need one. Btw, did you see that iCarly was deleted on VFD? --Mnb'z 05:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not until now. Well, like anybody was gonna read something that long.
- That was the point of the article. --Mnb'z 16:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Quite a long point indeed. 17:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
11:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- That was the point of the article. --Mnb'z 16:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not until now. Well, like anybody was gonna read something that long.
19:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Its nice to see someone else thinks we need one. Btw, did you see that iCarly was deleted on VFD? --Mnb'z 05:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yes! Yes we do! The thing that doesn't surprise is me is how you are the person who created it. Which is a positive thing. =)
Proposed external links[edit]
because the wikipedia portals have them. I'm mainly looking for other wikis
- mikipedia Maieusiophilia (pregnancy fetishism) wiki. Small, lame, and inactive, but that is why the link is funny
- Pregnancy wiki on wiki all but non-existent.
- wikipregnancy.com "serious" pregnancy wiki. --Mnb'z 16:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
reskin problem[edit]
Some of the "edit" links are going to non-existent pages. The formatting looks good though. --Mn-z 04:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I think I fixed it, it appeared to be a simple typo. --Mn-z 16:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)