Talk:Pork and beans

From Pee Review

Hello, could someone please review my article. I think it rocks but RfCs are good... Comments? --CyclePat 00:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	5	It's relatively amusing.... I would definitely say of average quality. I've seen much better, but I've also seen much worse.
Concept:	5	The concept is ok; definitely potential for lots of jokes, albeit low-brow humor jokes. You managed to do ok with it I think.
Prose and formatting:	6	The prose itself is ok, but there are a lot of non-sequiturs. The article seems like multiple articles spliced together or something. Also, you have too many quotes at the top; have 1 or 2 at most for this type of article. I like your division into subsections.
Images:	4	Neither the images nor captions are particularly engaging for the most part. At least there are multiple pictures, which is a plus over a lot of other articles I've seen.
Miscellaneous:	7	It looks like you've certainly put a lot of effort into it.
Final Score:	27	The article is definitely good enough to stay on Uncyclopedia, but also definitely needs improving to be a viable candidate on VFH. Hopefully a few others can help fix it up. For one of your first articles on Uncyc, it's a very good effort.
Reviewer:	--Composure1 00:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)