Talk:Pedophilia

2005

Feelings

i feel like that too. User:194.126.24.2 16:02, November 26, 2005

• me too User:68.107.146.194 12:13, August 23, 2006

No you don't! Shoo, shoo...-- Swami A. Suresh 18:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

2006

Image

Great new image, so cute! So good that I almost put my own name in this article! Ace Attacker 05:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

• The morality section isnt a joke and you know it, thats your pro kiddie fiddler soap box ya freaks. User:124.185.73.170 15:17, May 23, 2008

2023

Reiterating previous user's comment

Yea, I too found the article amusing, with an exception of entire morality part. I was under the impression you had to have a masters in satirical cynicism to obtain the sacred keys to the non-editable kingdom? Being that todays social climate is edging😏 quickly towards a disgusting normalization of these sickos and their depraved acts, backed by the most vile and pathetic of all degenerate sympathizers and neo-Marxist sexual degenerate libertarians, who are as autistic as they are socially inept, it would be a service to the visitors who come to this article intending to engage in innocent laughter (especially victims of abuse who are wishing to find a handle on their trauma through the art of black-comedy), to remove or greatly revise the morality section. Try to clean up the dog-people and pushers of queer-theory from page edits, they are the pseudo-academics and sexual-liberation dimwits inverting our society. Wasn't it terrible enough before? First Israel, now unencyclopedia. Shave the children... SAVE! Sorry, Freudian dick... SLIP! Evidently editing was disallowed yet the least-funny section-edit remained. That being said, I highly recommend the totally not corny original joke about the pseudo-etymological nature of the title containing root word "paid/paed"... it's a comedic work in progress. The nuts and bolts are there, if any architects of the 5th humour want to take a whack at it, then I would be relieved of my sacred life energy. ☺️ Thats sick, you're going to hell buddy! I'm not you're buddy guy! I'm not... damn am I really doing this bit? And by myself nonetheless? I'm nearing the level of pathos which the author of morality section meets. 😞 Kilroy was here, say no to queers. -El'ronMuskRat 06:45 Jul 1st, 2023

On reading that section, I find that it has a real comedy strategy (irony, perhaps ladled on unusually thickly) and in fact is about something real (society's bright-line-versus-fuzzy-line criteria for its taboos). So I think your main objection is that it doesn't align with your demonstrably strong beliefs. Be careful not to turn this article or this website into a battleground, as there are editors who feel as strongly in the opposite direction. Spıke 🎙️13:03 1-Jul-23