Talk:Googlewhack

From Pee Review

Well....I think its ready to be unleased upon the world. Gentlemen, and Ladies, I would like to hear your thoughts. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• Naturally, I really like it but fear it will be written off on VFH due to its sexual nature. At the same time, I don't see how this article could be anything but what it is, given the basic premise of what Googlewhacking is. ~ T. (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, it's quite a good article. Great will be the muttering among the hoi and polloi as they try to figure out what frumious and diphallic mean. It's good for their craniums, but probably not likely to make the article popular among those who idolize fart jokes.----OEJ 16:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• I like the editorial notes in there. A good concept well executed. Have yourself a cheese butty on me. -- Hindleyite 17:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• I love it, but would like to see more googlewhacks sprinkled throughout the article. 15Mickey20 19:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, particularly the last point. I think thats the only chance I have of saving this article from being one long masturbation gag. Glad people like it though. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• I acctually kind of liked the article better with just 8 items in the top 10 list. Other then that, jolly good article Mhaille. --Sir Zombiebaron 01:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)