Talk:General Motors
|
This article should not* be transformed into a template. It should then not* be put in any article you can get hold of, which, in turn, should then itself not* be turned into a template.
|
Ralmot, etc..[edit]
User:JimboWales: I don't really think it's fair to re-enter the Ralmot/Lindsay Lohan/Mountain Dew stuff as this was what was originally tagged for rewrite. I think the idea of 'general' = 'boring' holds the article well enough [where I have left your other 'GM related' edits], so if there is any special reason that the Ralmot stuff needs to be inserted - please enlighten me. Otherwise, you may be better off creating Ralmot for your own needs. --theRealSheep 13:58, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I thought the reason for the rewrite was that there was nothing related to cars in this article. Now that we have something related to cars, I guess it could be reinserted?--JimboWales 10:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I guess you would have to ask Carlb why the rewrite tag was added - but it may not have been just because it was not car related. The main problem I had with re-inserting the Ralmot stuff was that it made no reference to General Motors at all [the company, or cars]. Although being objective, I feel this adds nothing to the article [although I do realise that the content of many a Uncyclopedian page is questionable at best]. As I mentioned above - no-one has yet created Ralmot, otherwise if there is special reason you have GM to be known as Ralmot, please, please, tell me now. --theRealSheep 14:13, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)