Forum:What's do you think is so funny about AAAAAAA!?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > What's do you think is so funny about AAAAAAA!?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4008 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

What do you think makes it so funny? <sig>Serminigo Whirling Star of Vigilance Captain Archibald Haddock and Assmonkey</sig> 09:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess English isn't your native language. It doesn't translate well. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 10:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

It was the first of its kind. Original in other words. Original can be funny. Picture this, when you lose a testicle it's funny. The second time no-so-much. Okay, bad analogy.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Sermingo: nothing, it isn't. The pictures are quite good though. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess that Serminigo doesn't speak AAAAAAAAA! either, since he misspelled it as "AAAAAAA". It's a common mistake, AAAAAAAAA!_(language) should help with the translations. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

From that article it looks like translating back would be terrible... --KWild 12:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not, FOREST FIRE WEEK! Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?

The Article is part of the entire construct of the self reverence in-jokey nature of lots of articles. To mention AAAAAAAAA! at some certain point in your article need for AAAAAAAAA! to exist. In itself the funny of the article AAAAAAAAA! is pretty mundane but the whole linking spoofing and other controversial things it has spawned make it one of the best. It is wildly recognizable as a true uncyclopedia article, even if you don't get it AT ALL. ( like ED people, who are clue on the subject why AAAAAAAAA! exist). So you so not need to find AAAAAAAAA! funny, as long as you understands it's importance within the culture.--Vosnul 13:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Basically, the reason why AAAAAAAAA! cracks us up is that it was designed to be the perfectly formatted Wiki article that had no content whatsoever. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

O yeah. also that .. --Vosnul 17:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Same here. It is mocking the whole idea of a wiki article. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I have a good idea for the next nonsense. Make one that says I'm Ready from spongebob. Noting but a page full of I'm readysCan of Worms 23:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

No, that is silly. It's just copying AAAAAAAAA! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

...And with the list we have of these cookie cutting articles I don't think we need any more of them. --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

22:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

• AAAAAAAAA!--Procopius 23:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAA! is certainly much funnier than EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! or OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! and definitely more hilarious than just plain A! which, I think is not funny at all. D. G. Neree 00:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Okee, but what about YYYYYYYYYYYYY!. I think YYYYYYYYYYYY! has potential. Y i hear you ask ?. Y do you beg the question ? I retort. I'd say YYYYYYYYYY! not. --Vosnul 07:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I think the best idea would be Zzzzzzzzz... --User:Nintendorulez 00:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• Maybe it was once funny, but that was definitely a long time ago. Now it's like a joke you hear when you're nine years old and repeat it a hundred times. LBcrusader 20:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

It's funny because it's 200 lines of non-stop screaming

Notice that the page is NOT called "AAAAAAAAA" but is in fact called "AAAAAAAAA!".

Seriously, if while reading this you just let the little voice in your head emit a constant, unending scream at the top of its little lungs, the inherent humour is revealed.

(If I had superpowers, I'd change it so that all of the paragraphs end with an exclamation mark, just to make this point even clearer.) --L 12:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

What would make it even more funny, if you added a B right at the end of the article :P Mistress of the Clow ~ Cardcaptor Stacey [Talk] [Work] [Uncyclopedia Fanlisting] 12:57, 22 November 2006

NO! Do you have any idea how many vandals have put Bs in? Thanks to people like you, nobody is allowed to edit it, even long-time users. --User:Nintendorulez 00:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Hahah! I'm not a vandal! It was just being stupid :P Mistress of the Clow ~ Cardcaptor Stacey [Talk] [Work] [Uncyclopedia Fanlisting] 15:00, 23 November 2006

What would make it funnier is if you put a + right at the end of the article. Except not really. --L 04:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

It's funnier if you're just poking around random articles, you find a bunch of otherwise well-formed stuff, then along comes a well-formatted page full of AAAAAAAAA! out of nowhere. Except that you'll never find a bunch of well-formed stuff if you keep doing random, so I'll say it's best as a big page of nonsense. Consistent nonsense. That... works once. As a running joke? Look, it's just funny, okay? Geez. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 22:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)