Forum:New UnBooks and UnMeta Image
|
NOTE: I'm sorry that this topic is under Martial Law. Anyone who hates this idea will be tracked down and killed.
Now, I am concerned about Uncyclopedia being stuck in the past, while Wikipedia gets to go to the future. Why? Because we're the worst. Now, should we have the UnBooks and UnMeta logo changed? You decide.
P.S. I opened the discussion so I can get many people to modernise Uncyclopedia, and that means the admins, who look after this place. After all, where would we be without them?
Comments are welcome. Now comment, or you will become a dick.
- Note: Wikibooks, Meta.
- Warning: Wikipedia's Meta is pretty meta. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
For those of you who are too lazy, here's a simple version:
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
Votes
Change the two logos
- For. If they've changed, we should as well. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. As per Modus. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- What are we waiting for? Let's change them now! 05:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- For We are a parody of Wikipedia. MrN Fork you! 14:35, Mar 9
Keep the old logos
- For. We should make them change back. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:39, 08 Feb 2009
- For. Not to say that Joe completely ignores what I said on my talk page. ~ 13:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. The new ones look tacky--Sycamore (Talk) 08:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- This is an outrage! You have a talkpage?! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)!
- I left a message on Hindleyite's talkpage, but he's been somewhat inactive lately. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Additional questions/suggestions
Now that we're talking about new logos, how about changing the Uncycloversity logo? And has anyone noticed that Wikimedia has a logo for their "incubator" now?
Also a lot of all these Wikimedia logos, have some kind of sliced globe in them, or a red little sphere. It may not always be practical to put a potato in the logo. But this sliced globe stuff got me thinking... sliced potatoes... fries! We could use a bowl of fries to replace certain spherical stuff in the original logos. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. But they should be called chips. Could we have a section for us Jewish users (UnTorah - the content-free Pentateuch that anyone can edit?) with a latke as a logo too? :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- A possible new logo? I say yes. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- You wouldn't be the first person to think that - the original UnMeta image: • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:39, 08 Feb 2009
- This affirms that it's a terrific idea. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. Soauu has a point. Pack it up, lads. Lets pretend this never happened. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Did what happen? --Nachlader 23:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- What the fuck are you talking about, Modusoperandi? Seriously, where you get all this stuff is a complete mystery to me. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Did what happen? --Nachlader 23:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. Soauu has a point. Pack it up, lads. Lets pretend this never happened. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- This affirms that it's a terrific idea. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- A possible new logo? I say YES! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- You sir are a genious. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:36, 19 Feb
- Thank you very much. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- You sir are a genious. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:36, 19 Feb
- A possible new logo? I say YES! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- A possible new logo? I say HOT DAMN! YES! YES! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try that. 06:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd do that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Or I'll tap that. 07:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd do that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll try that. 06:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- A possible new logo? I say HOT DAMN! YES! YES! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, modernize Uncyclopedia for great justice!
We will say to Jimbo Wales: ALL YOUR ARTICLE ARE BELONG TO US! But first, we should change the following logos:
- UnBooks
- UnMeta
- Uncycloversity
Oh and for those of you who are blind enough to realise there's a logo for it, here it is:
Hey people
What are we gonna do with the logos now? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would assume that, having done half the job, we will completely forget about them. Alternately, someone who knows the progamming stuff could swap out the images. One of those. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- I can swap out the images for the UnBooks. Now, can I have permission? 05:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- No. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:19, 20 Feb
- I say "yes", but nobody listens to me. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I listen to you, but then again, who am I? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hope it works. If it doesn't, then I will sue you on the contempt! 08:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- What contempt? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- On the contempt of the Uncyclopedian Parliament! 06:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- What about the Parliament-Funkadelic? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's a bit long. 08:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- But they have Dr. Funkenstein! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's a bit long. 08:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- What about the Parliament-Funkadelic? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- On the contempt of the Uncyclopedian Parliament! 06:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- What contempt? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I can swap out the images for the UnBooks. Now, can I have permission? 05:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
<youtube width="300" height="300"> 99pY1wcXTh4 </youtube>
- Perhaps, but do they have his clones? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:36, Mar 6
- The case of the new images is now held by the admins. And so are the Funkadelic clones. And the entire Uncyclopedia Parliament. 10:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- NOBODY MOVE! I HAVE A BOP GUN! Actually, scratch that. EVERYBODY MOVE! I HAVE A BOP GUN AND WE ARE ABOUT TO GET FUNKY! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:16, Mar 7
- The case of the new images is now held by the admins. And so are the Funkadelic clones. And the entire Uncyclopedia Parliament. 10:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but do they have his clones? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:36, Mar 6
Hey people
What are we gonna do with the legos now? Most of them are stuck up my nose... Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 20:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Leave them there. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
It's been done
Who the hell revived this forum? Didn't Lyrithya changed the logos a year ago? 12:01, December 29, 2012 (UTC)