Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Forum:An ethics/technical question...
So I'm making some changes to one of my articles, and I'd like to present it to Pee Review to see what people think and what kind of things people would like to see on it. Possibly someone else could add something, too. My problem is that the article already has a Pee Review page, but it's almost a month old and not noticeable at all. So I have two questions for this august community...
- 1. How would I go about re-adding or re-creating the Pee Review page for the article?
- And more importantly...
- 2. Would this count as article whoring or otherwise being an asshat?
Thanks for your time. --Andorin Kato 21:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Link me to the Pee Review page and I will delete it so you can remake it. I don't think you would be article whoring, as Pee Review is just a place to polish up articles. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bob the Generic n00b --Andorin Kato 21:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Link me to the Pee Review page and I will delete it so you can remake it. I don't think you would be article whoring, as Pee Review is just a place to polish up articles. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)