Uncyclopedia talk:RYA/classic
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ballots[edit]
I guess my only suggestion to this great idea is this: having a mix of qualities where sometimes 10=good and sometimes 10=bad is a bit confusing. Would you consider:
- (A) Changing to a Likert scale system where:
- 1 = does not describe this Admin
- 2 = sometimes describes this Admin
- 3 = undecided
- 4 = often true of this Admin
- 5 = almost always true of this Admin
~ or ~
- (B) Changing the characteristics list so that each descriptor is positive (rather than the current mix of positive/negative). That way high ratings = positive, low ratings = negative across the board.
Bravo, Dawg!!! -- T. (talk) 03:19, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I thought all of those were positive... Seriously, though, I like idea A, except with more range. I'll get right on it. 06:54, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I get a 100% A+ Happy face all the thyme! --Savethemooses 22:28, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- The new rating scale doesn't match the ballots and ballot examples. --Sir gwax (talk) 22:06, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Defeating the purpose[edit]
So is the purpose of this to be an admin game where we compliment/make fun of each other or is it to get real feedback from users? Not to be a sourpuss, but if the intent is the latter, I highly recommend that none of us write anything about anyone else because we do enough of that on IRC, it tells us nothing and it will likely discourage actual non-admin, user comments. --Sir gwax (talk) 21:59, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)