UnNews talk:Pro-choice group demands right to carry out post-natal abortions
The title alone is hilarious! 98.217.88.250 00:16, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
I believe infanticide is the opinion of the chief of Medical Ethics at Princeton. Don't know if he's serious or just trying to be thought-provoking.
This story shows the problem I have with political satire by parodying the opposition: Its mischaracterization of pro-choice people is not too far off what pro-life people do in all seriousness (for example: legal abortion sets the moral stage for infanticide). So I can't read this without wondering to what extent it's propaganda via humor rather than humor. Nevertheless, Chief added [Category:Nonsense], which I removed as it seemed to be an overt value judgement on the content.
I.P.Anon last night tried to extend this article, also spoiled the simple ending with vulgarity; An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays wisely reverted him. Spıke Ѧ 09:06 19-Jun-10
- Well I'm pro-choice in virtually all circumstances, so its not an attempt to promote the pro-life cause. -- medieval Ape (rebel) (Riot Porn) 20:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
Yes--although the biggest potential joke on the issue is the emerging line that coerced funding of it by strangers is the new "pro-choice" position. Spıke Ѧ 02:36 20-Jun-10
- You mean the position that poor people should be able to have access to a necessary medical procedure at the taxpayer's expense? I would agree with that. -- medieval Ape (rebel) (Riot Porn) 11:48, June 20, 2010 (UTC)