UnNews talk:ED dies
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ED dies page. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| This article was nominated for deletion on May 18, 2007.
The result of the discussion was Keep.
|
|||
Comment[edit]
This isn't really that funny at all. Sorry. Furluminati 05:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, we should have done the Vtech thing and waited a year after the tragedy. Or possibly longer since nobody ever said how long we would wait. We should replace this with a link that says "today we're all ed-iots" and goes to a page where you get information on how you can pledge your fealty Hrodulf 20:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- That would be funny. About the article though, the middle part seems good and original, and they do over use "lulz" ridiculously. But the beginning and closing don't match the tone. It just sounds too much like the people who complain about websites they don't like, and doesn't match style of a "newsy" satire. Furluminati 22:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- "newsy" satire? Well, this is UnNews, not "Perpendicular to Reality News" or "Satirical Bombast Quarterly", or something. Stuff of that elk is best done by The Onion and such, where they have smart people who can spell properly, and don't smell of garlic so much. Now, give me some money so I can buy two more cameras to do UnNewsVideos which look zackly like Fox News, but with more smarm. Bless you, and thank you for suffering, young son.
Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 00:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- "newsy" satire? Well, this is UnNews, not "Perpendicular to Reality News" or "Satirical Bombast Quarterly", or something. Stuff of that elk is best done by The Onion and such, where they have smart people who can spell properly, and don't smell of garlic so much. Now, give me some money so I can buy two more cameras to do UnNewsVideos which look zackly like Fox News, but with more smarm. Bless you, and thank you for suffering, young son.
- That would be funny. About the article though, the middle part seems good and original, and they do over use "lulz" ridiculously. But the beginning and closing don't match the tone. It just sounds too much like the people who complain about websites they don't like, and doesn't match style of a "newsy" satire. Furluminati 22:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
great news[edit]
you have been invited to die in a fire! for only $1, you get all that fire-burny action for creating articles on sites that don't concern us. have a great day! --
23:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- YOU FAIL. --Hrodulf 22:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, they're back up. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- They still have the tin cup out though. I've decided not to do a "they're back" article, and if they're back for good, this one still serves as misinformation, or a "Dewey defeats Truman" moment of sorts. --Hrodulf 20:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, they're back up. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)