UnNews talk:Dinesh D'souza on the real problem with Newtonism
Excuses[edit]
I don't know if this fits UnNews. Frankly, I don't care. D'souza's column is so nutty, so skewed, so fucked up in every conceivable way, that it simply must be satirized (even if the duty, unfortunately, falls to my incompetent fingers). Yes, I swore. Get over it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- You are my hero. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:10 Apr 05, 2008
- Thanks. I try. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
I really want to put this in:
But I'm not sure how to do that without fuckz0ring up the formatting. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:19 Apr 05, 2008
- The page is already packed (repetition being best when it repeats, I find)....I don't know. Does that help? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you can find one that's vertical, rather than horizontal, it would be an apt replacement for the diagram...but other than that, there's no room. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, darn it. I just figured there should be something that completely contradicts the diagram already on there. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:34 Apr 05, 2008
- Darn it, indeed. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a persistent bastard, but I don't want to make the column look messy. Oh well. Figured I'd upload anyway just 'cuz. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 21:42 Apr 05, 2008
- Also, you've got rabies. Sorry, I didn't know I had it when I bit you. Got any water? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a persistent bastard, but I don't want to make the column look messy. Oh well. Figured I'd upload anyway just 'cuz. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 21:42 Apr 05, 2008
- Darn it, indeed. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, darn it. I just figured there should be something that completely contradicts the diagram already on there. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:34 Apr 05, 2008
Yo. Its a great article but from my perspective the pics should be on one side, otherwise it looks rather eh... sorta like I did here maybe (I'm a sucker for good formatting) -- 12:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Welcome to Uncyclopedia: the content-free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.Erm...like this? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)- Using the this thing to make columns. Makes it look more like a real column as it separates the pictures... I'll just do it then -- 13:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
__NOTOC__ {| width="96%" border="0" |-valign="top" |width="85%"|
- That looks like majik to me. Most things do. I'm both superstitious and ignorant. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- There (I don't know how it works (witchcraft?) it just does) -- 13:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now, all the original images fit. Hurrah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- There (I don't know how it works (witchcraft?) it just does) -- 13:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- That looks like majik to me. Most things do. I'm both superstitious and ignorant. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk about a delayed reaction.[edit]
I just realized that D'souza (in the original column) is essentially saying "The problem with science is that it's not supernatural." What a knob. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)