Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Talk:Ye Olde Webbe Desyne Shoppe
PoorNUnknown 13:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)This is one of the finest Uncyc pages I've read for a while. If it doesn't become a featured article, there is no justice in this world. RabbiTechno 12:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Wow! Thanks a lot!!! --PoorNUnknown 13:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Yay! Featured!!! /me falls over in amazement --PoorNUnknown 11:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
btw: leave the typos alone: or at least use real words (not ones like 'befour') that would get past a spellchecker --PoorNUnknown 11:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Knew it'd be featured. Words such as 'befour' were nothing to do with me, incidentally. RabbiTechno 17:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I knew it wasn't you...thanks again. May all your sons become president! --PoorNUnknown 17:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
amazing![edit]
Amazing article!
Thx! --PoorNUnknown 17:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, this is one of the funniest articles I have read so far. Good job on the feature, PoorNUnknown! 213.165.173.124 20:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- The graphics and captions are excellent! However, I think it was the linkage on "plain old-fashioned money" that had me ROFLMAO.... Gustav7890123 21:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again! Got any sisters? ;) --PoorNUnknown 12:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- The graphics and captions are excellent! However, I think it was the linkage on "plain old-fashioned money" that had me ROFLMAO.... Gustav7890123 21:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit]
Go on, you know you want to...
| Humour: | 7 | The good bits of the humor are directly related to the good bit of the concept. Needs more. I always prefer it when the humor develops itself, line by line, pushing the concept in new directions. |
| Concept: | 9 | The web-of-old idea is brilliant. I love that. I love it so much, I would just make this a straight history article, and leave out the "shop" stuff and comparisons with today's web. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Seems solid enough. I'm the last person to ask though. I hate letters. |
| Images: | 8 | Funny because they represent the "history" bit of the concept. |
| Miscellaneous: | 5 | I don't know what a Misc. score is for, but I'll use this bit to say I would really raise the score if this were written as straight history and more comedy was injected into the lines - of which, also, there should be more. |
| Final Score: | 37 | Good score that could be better. |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 05:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |
a comment from the author:...The 'Shoppe' bit refers to something we Brits have in some towns, namely an 'Olde Tea Shoppe' or 'Olde Craft Shoppe' with the 'Shop' bit spelt in a (fake?) Elizabethan way. That's why it's a 'Shoppe'...many thanks for the kind review.--PoorNUnknown 16:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Oscar wilde/russian reversal removed[edit]
Good idea...they're both getting a bit cheesy these days. --PoorNUnknown 09:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)