Talk:Vladimir Nabokov

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vladimir Nabokov article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

It's been a while since I've read Lolita, but I don't remember Nabokov being quite so bouncy and wordplay-heavy. To me this article reads more like an extremely toned-down (i.e. comprehensible) Finnegans Wake. But I might be misremembering. --—rc (t) 23:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Erm, take a look at "That In Aleppo Once", I'd say that was pretty damn wordplay heavy :P --Olipro 17:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

This is definitely an exageration of Lolita (even quotes from it), rather than an understated Finnegan's Wake. I've read Lolita on numerous occasions and, IMHO, this captures the language and tone rather well (albeit in the aforementioned exagerated manner).

Cheers

-- Major Major 04:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I absolutely love the chess picture. It made my day. --Spin 06:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Outstanding

This is an excellent article. 69.142.21.24 16:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I agree. I only hope my contribution was positive.

Fuck. This article is good.

Really fucking great.