Talk:The Last King of Scotland
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pee Review[edit]
Humour: | 9 | Very well done and I understand why you have nominated it! Very good jokes and I haven't spotted any sections with no humor. Something which you can add:
These are just suggestions and I did not find any defects. |
Concept: | 8 | I liked the article very much and your concept of glorifying and making fun of Scots and Bonnie is very good! You explained everything well and the humor coexists with the history. The fact that you named the article after a movie but talked about Bonnie is also funny. However,
|
Prose and formatting: | 7 | Nice job but a Proofreading service won't do any harm. Concerning the encyclopediness, there is a lot of story-telling and of your personal opinion as well as your national honour. Knowing the subject of your article, I don't know if you want to change this and I leave this choice for you.
Meanwhile, here is my small proofreading (I will tell you about several grammar mistakes which I often cannot correct myself because I don't know how you want the sentences to look like; all the mistakes are very small):
Otherwise, I have not noticed anything else. |
Images: | 7.5 | Very good but the last parts, if illustrated, would have an even better humor and effect on the reader. You can add a picture connected to Scots running away, something about Bonnie's wife, etc. Try to choose something that will look true and historic but then destroy this impression with the proper caption.
|
Miscellaneous: | 7.9 | Average score. I don't have much to add except for the fact that this is one of texts that do not annoy you with all that Wikipedia stuff (templates, etc.). |
Final Score: | 39.4 | Very good article! To sum up, there is not much to do about humor, on the contrary to formatting. You concept is great and I understand that this article has been written by a real Scot! |
Reviewer: | Anton (talk) 16:15, June 20, 2013 (UTC) |