Talk:The Demented Cartoon Movie
I think this article is brilliant. If I get a chance, I'm nominating it for featured. Just so you know. Mrthejazz 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- ...Go ahead whenever you feel like. It's not like it has to pass a rigorous test to be nominated in the first place. --Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Guess what[edit]
i added a few things for zeeky Demented Kill 05:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Characters[edit]
Okay kids, I think we have plenty of characters at the moment. I suggest we focus more on the plotline with future edits, simple though it is to add bio-blurbs. --Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 18:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I love this article[edit]
I give it an A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -- 01:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit]
The Demented Cartoon Movie[edit]
Methinks I've made significant progress on this article by now. How does it look to you? Does it make me look fat? --Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 16:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 10 | I'm truly at a loss for words, as I was when I first saw the cartoon no more than a few months ago. The effort that must've been put into this just baffles me. |
| Concept: | 9 | Truly unique and bizarre, but that's sort of what I had anticipated. Don't expect everybody to know what this article it talking about though, which might be the only drawback of pushing to get it featured. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Nothing seems to be wrong here. |
| Images: | 10 | Serve their purpose and what-not, but my only recommendation would be making them a bit bigger, especially the first one. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | Nice British overtone with a clever link to Mhaille's userpage on "umbrella-wielding gibberish speaking lunatic on a skateboard". |
| Final Score: | 49 | Worthy of the front page, my good friend. Excellent job. |
| Reviewer: | --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC) | |
| Humour: | 5 | Some of it is funny, but much is just the description of the movie. |
| Concept: | 6 | The idea of describing a completely random movie is a bit original, but not overwhelmingly creative |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | It is laid out rather well. |
| Images: | 7 | Has only a few pictures, but they are small and intentionaly sloppy. They are however colorful. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | It definately gets high marks for randomness, but some may not see any humor in it |
| Final Score: | 35 | Seems more of an advertisement than an article. |
| Reviewer: | --User:Ghouck/sig 17:21, 5/13/07 | |
| Humour: | 4 | Honestly, it seems like this has everything but good humor in it. |
| Concept: | 7 | Although unoriginal, the idea of treating TDCM like one of the literary masterpiece/classics is a novel one. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Pretty simple, but a good simple. |
| Images: | 3 | Blarg. Three direct screenshots, all clumped together. No thanks. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | The misleading links were good for a chuckle. |
| Final Score: | 28 | Better than most work on Uncyclopedia, but not anything truly amazing. |
| Reviewer: | --Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 15:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | |
I don't wanna make another table, so I'm just gonna say that it's not as good as the first review and not as bad as the other two. Personally I liked it, but not everyone diggs the random/satire hidden in links humor. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon 
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)