Talk:Laughter
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
The nomination was not successful. ~Low health (19%) MrN    Fork you! 17:02, Mar 29This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 17:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC). An archive of the VFH vote can be found here |
From Pee Review[edit]
Laughter[edit]
Spent a while on this. Hope you all enjoy my sherious with oddities sense of humor. High fives under the table for all! Just some feedback and what not, help me out with it! --Quall 10:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Laughter a link to my article. Thank you.
| Humour: | 4.5 | Low because score annihilated from too many true facts or humor too dry |
| Concept: | 6.5 | weakened by humor score |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Very goodly wrote, and comprehsionable |
| Images: | 7 | Need more images |
| Miscellaneous: | 4 | This was't sporked from wikipedia was it? |
| Final Score: | 32 | Its a good article, but I'm left hanging waiting for a gag or punchline. |
| Reviewer: | User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 03:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | |
- Note = Not sporked from wiki, totally off the top of my head.
I'll review it too.
| Humour: | 7 | I found this pretty funny, but expansion and more jokes would help. |
| Concept: | 8 | I'm surprised none of our experienced writers have done this one yet. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | The format and grammar is good, but expansion would help. Also, the ending doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps making the ending like a conclusion would be better. |
| Images: | 6 | Need more images. |
| Miscellaneous: | 7 | This was't sporked from wikipedia was it? No, of course it was't. But, as I mentioned before, expansion is needed. |
| Final Score: | 36 | Expand this, give it more jokes and images and this could well be feature worthy. |
| Reviewer: |  Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
| |