Talk:Homosexuality in the British military

Wow - nice work. This looks like an obvious feature to me. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 19:01, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

thanks! i think starting an article with a slighty vague title is the best way to heighten overall humour. :) --nldr 19:18, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yo baby! You should really not use footnotes for Wikipedia links. Just straight shoot them over for terms like cockblocker, in my opinion, but if you wish to have the presentation look all complicated and encyclopedic that's your prerogative. ;-) --    14:49, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

My feeling was that having a list of wikipedia.org/something on a repetitive basis would perform all else but to let torrid buzzkill set in for the reader, but I did like that they were links. I'll change the name to each link to something more natural (and yet encyclopaedic). But only when I'm executing secondary objectives. --nldr

^done --nldr

Very enjoyable.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

thanks, sarge --nldr 16:04, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

So when are you going to nom it for feature. My feature-voting trigger finger has been itching to vote for this one, and I've had to put ice on it just to keep it from keeping me awake at night. AleisterIC 16:23 27 6 MMX

cant be frigging arsed --nldr 17:16, June 27, 2010 (UTC)--nldr 17:16, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

An article needs to be nommed? Why didn't anyone ask this earlier? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:23, 27 June 2010

see above --nldr 17:40, June 27, 2010 (UTC)