Talk:Homo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homo article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

		This article was nominated for deletion on September 1, 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.

comment

OK, after much stinking thinking I find that the bulk of this article was written to mock and deride the 12-year-old skank-boy use of "homo" as derogatory gay-hating slang. Therefore the insertion of undescended-testicle skank-boy "jokes" about "anus of altarboy" and bathhouses and feces runs counter to the rest of the article. So I edited them out.

There are plenty of places on Uncyclopedia where people like Jaysandkays can write pre-adolescent homophobic insults. The Homo article is not the place for them. This article points out -- at boringly elaborate length -- that a 12-year-old's characterization of "homo" as a terrible insult is silly as sucking sheep shit in a sandstorm. So, you 12-year-olds, lets just leave them out of the article, shall we? ----OEJ 20:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)