Talk:History of the Dutch

Discussion over the merging of Dutch into The Dutch shall be taking place in the more grammatically correct of the two: The Dutch. Please feel free to leave a comment on what the resident dutch here believe they should be combined into.

-St. Fenix (User•Talk) 17:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

to be nitpicky dutch and the dutch can be looked at as 2 different things. It's these two piles of rubbish articles that seem to be more or less the same, or to the same amount identical incoherent tripe. But if anybody ever wanted to make an article about the dutch that ethnic group of people that mostly came from the Netherlands, then thats the place for you. ( not the Netherlands of course, the item name the dutch ). Dutch by itself is a reference to the language and the culture and is the name space you want for this. ( we have no culture and this dutch language is a joke, so do not bother to look in to it.) But furthermore, by all means, merge away, and in the process of that, please don't be modest and rip these two pages of horrid badlyness to shreds. Although without some form of concept the page will be subject to the usual crap like pointless dumb dutch cusses and other stupid stuff my down syndrome like countrymen are likely to come up with.--Vosnul 22:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

He means the likes of me. -- di Mario 14:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

The Dutch is now a redirect. It truly was a sad article, always redirect when neonazis try to be funny.Does it really matter? 18:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)